Here's the funny thing about that question in terms of me as someone who takes pictures. I don't know that much about equipment or film. A lot of what I do, I've done because I didn't know any better and have accidentally discovered the results. I think a lot of artists experience this and for me, this was the best way to go about it.
That being said, I did want to say that most often, if I'm just documenting life or taking pictures for the blog or doing easy picture taking, I use a little point and shoot digital camera. It is sufficient. In fact, it is more than sufficient. But, if I'm in a setting where I know there may be potential for what I like to think of as "elevated" images, or pictures that could really stand above and beyond, I generally have my big clunky Mamiya and some Fuji 200, 35mm film.
Some people ask me why I use film, and in short all I can say is that film contains more information than digital does. Even more importantly, the information, to my eye, is more interesting. I appreciate digital and am thankful for digital, just like I feel about CD's and mp3's but sometimes you need to listen to vinyl, ya know?
No comments:
Post a Comment